If nearly any other comparison was used, this picture wouldn’t keep my attention. But it has a good point. If someone else is driving drunk, do we take away all of the people’s cars? In my opinion its the same thing with guns. If a criminal is using a gun, why take away the law abiding citizens gun? The criminal will still have their gun after gun control, its part of why they are criminals. If you take the citizens gun, you make them a victim instead of a defender of themselves and their property.
Lieutenant from the Alaska State Troopers on NatGEO.
So basically no gun control activists should go to Alaska because just about everyone has to have an “assault style weapon” to survive up there. From the mouth of a trooper just about everyone has an AR15, now remember that’s the biggest scariest gun to a gun control nut. Now just about everyone has one…hmmmm then I wonder how many mass shootings Alaska has had? ….I just goggled it…looks like the last big murders that rocked Alaska was in 1983…and there’s no reports of mass shootings with an “assault style” weapons…what’s that tell you…do guns kill people or do people kill people?
all these naked doctors. kid’s show my ass
for a moment I was trying to figure out how Nine could be considered naked and then I realized he didn’t have his jacket on…
this is an accurate representation of my entire life
Also applies to TV series.
Might I add, they’re reading Sherlock Holmes.
AND THEN THEY SPENT THE DAY COSPLAYING IN LONDON
just a thought
Teaching gun safety is probably better than banning guns for civilians.